USA



Home Blog Page 29

Molting Sequence in Chickens

Each fall most chickens go through an annual molt, during which a shiny new set of feathers replaces their previous plumage. During the molt, nutrients used to produce eggs are diverted to producing feathers. As a result, laying slows, or ceases altogether. The best layers molt fast and furious, as if in a hurry to get back to the business of laying. The lazier hens molt slowly, and therefore lay fewer eggs over time. You can determine which is which by observing the molting sequence in chickens.

Molting Sequence

The molting sequence in chickens always occurs in a specific order. First to renew are the head feathers. Then, in order, feathers on the back, breast, stern, thighs, and wings. Last are the tail feathers.

The better layers normally lay for a year or more before molting. And they generally take between 14 and 16 weeks to complete the molt.

The poorer layers may lay for only a few months before going into a molt. And their molt may take as long as six months to complete. Because they drop and replace a few feathers at a time, your lazier hens tend to always look sleek and shiny.

Pin Feathers

You can gauge the length of the molting sequence in your chickens by watching for newly emerging pin feathers on each bird, particularly the head as molting begins, and the tail as molting is ending. Pin feathers are also called blood feathers, because they contain a supply of protein-rich blood to nourish the growing feather.

The blood-filled pin feathers, especially the highly visible ones around the tail and along the back, may attract picking. Picking occurs because the pickers crave additional protein during the molt.

Since your better layers drop more feathers at a time, they tend to have more concentrated pin feathers. They are therefore more likely to be the targets of picking, which can lead to cannibalism.

After the Molt

Once a feather is fully formed, the blood supply recedes and no further feather growth occurs. So a fully formed feather that breaks stays broken until the next molt. Because your better layers keep their feathers longer, their plumage may look rather rough as the next molt approaches.

Whether a hen is a lazy slow molter or a more productive fast molter, after the molt, her ability to convert feed into eggs will improve. Also her eggs will be larger and their quality will be better than they were prior to the molt.

Helpful Links

Why Do Chickens Molt?

How to Help Your Chickens Through a Molt

And that’s today’s news from the Cackle Coop.

Source: The Cackle Hatchery

Lilong Chai’s research looks to a cage-free future for poultry farming

Cage free.

The term seems self-explanatory enough. Step inside a cage-free poultry house, and the reality is not far detached from the perception. A soft bed of wood shavings or sand litters the ground. Step carefully, as it’s likely you’ll find an egg or two scattered randomly underfoot. And there are chickens everywhere, freely roaming like a crowd at a flea market.

Cage-free poultry systems—indoor aviaries that house colonies of up to thousands of birds—offer an improved level of animal welfare for egg-laying hens. They are free to walk, scratch, forage, spread their wings, and perch—all vital natural behaviors.

Still, “cage free” is not as simple as the name suggests. An egg that comes from an uncaged laying hen may not be materially nor nutritionally different from one laid in conventional cages. Cage-free poultry farming is not more efficient, cost-effective, nor even safer than conventional caged production. But it’s likely to be the future of poultry farming.

According to United Egg Producers, the cage-free egg market will reach 70% by 2030, however there are significant challenges to that prediction. The economics of transitioning to cage-free systems are daunting. Increased labor costs make it more expensive to operate cage-free poultry farms, a cost then passed on to consumers. And cage-free systems come with their own welfare concerns, ranging from air quality and floor-litter management to hens laying their eggs on the aviary floor or demonstrating adverse behaviors such as aggressively pecking other hens.

“It will cost about $10 billion for all producers to make the transition,” said Lilong Chai, associate professor of poultry science at the University of Georgia College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences (CAES) and a leading figure in precision poultry research. “Our research goal is promoting cage-free welfare management for laying hens, egg safety, and environmental sustainability toward climate-smart egg production.”

CAES researchers like Chai are leading those meaningful steps toward more efficient, safe, and eventually cost-effective poultry production.

Bringing technology into the coop

There’s a balance that must be struck between the welfare of the birds and the economics of the industry.

“That’s where we are right now,” said Claudia Dunkley, public service associate in poultry science for UGA Extension on the Tifton campus. “Overall, it’s not economically as competitive when you compare it to the caged systems. It’s cheaper to run those than commercial aviary systems.”

These are the challenges that UGA researchers are addressing via precision poultry farming technologies. By integrating computer vision and robotics, their research is leading to impactful transformation.

Precision poultry farming uses advanced sensing technologies for real-time data collection, analysis, and interpretation to improve production, reproduction, animal welfare, food safety and quality, and sustainability. It attends to the health and well-being of the poultry, acknowledging that healthier and less stressed hens yield more quality eggs. Machine vision technology, blending sensors and cameras with learning algorithms to interpret behavior from visual data, allows for subtle observations of poultry behavior and physiology, enhancing early detection capabilities while remaining non-invasive and maintaining biosecurity.

Chai’s research also addresses air quality in cage-free aviaries and mitigation of birds’ behavioral issues, including aggression and laying eggs on the floor instead of in the nesting areas.

“We have tested thermal imaging technologies for monitoring heat stress of cage-free hens in commercial cage-free houses,” Chai said. “We plan to implement our machine vision system for monitoring cage-free laying hen houses.”

Cage-free systems, to be sure, are no panacea for the birds’ welfare—they have their own challenges. Air quality overall is a major concern for both birds and laborers, as the free-moving animals stir up dust on the litter floors. And more social birds are also more susceptible to contagions.

Chai (center) leads a team of researchers that includes graduate students (from left) Samin Dahal, Xiao Yang, Bidur Paneru, and Anjan Dhungana.

“The number one concern is avian influenza outbreak,” said Chai, noting the largest outbreak in U.S. history in 2022 that caused egg prices to more than double.

Chai’s research investigates ways to mitigate the dust generation. Use of electrostatic particle ionization (EPI), for example, improves air quality by charging particles in the air. The EPI system emits negative ionsfrom a pipe suspended in the aviary. The negative ions naturally attract and surround particles in the air, in turn making them more likely to be attracted to grounded or positively charged surfaces. This magnet-like effect causes the particles to stick together and adhere to any surface they encounter

“The particulate matter concentrations are very high; that is hurting the health of animals and the farm workers,” Chai said, citing research from his previous lab at Iowa State that monitored dust concentration nine times higher in cage-free systems versus conventional cages. “There’s a big challenge.”

Chai said that by adjusting the litter bedding material and using an electrostatic charging system, they can reduce dust by 70% compared to the conventional cage system.

Said Dunkley: “We’ve been successful looking at some of the emissions that occur from the houses themselves and ways they can reduce emissions, like greenhouse gases in the poultry production houses.”

‘Birds lay eggs everywhere’

In conventional caging, birds’ eggs automatically go to an egg collection and transportation system. In cage-free systems, however, hens often opt to lay their eggs directly on the floor instead of in nesting areas. Some farmers report up to 10% of eggs can be laid on the floor, which—in a colony producing a million eggs in a day—means 100,000 of them must be collected manually.

It’s not a tenable situation.

Chai aims to reduce the number of floor eggs, as well as the amount of time eggs spend on the floor, which can affect their value.

“Birds lay eggs everywhere,” said Chai, noting this increases costs to producers because it leads to higher rates of contamination with harmful bacteria. In addition, floor eggs are not considered table eggs for direct sale and have a higher chance of getting broken and eaten by the hens.

“If the egg is not tracked and the issue not addressed in a timely manner, an egg could be buried by the birds in thick litter,” Chai said. “If the farm staff cannot find an egg in a couple of days, you never know if it is found like three weeks later and maybe is not healthy to eat. The farmer cannot tell if that is fresh from today or from a month ago.”

Additional studies by Chai’s lab investigates ways to detect floor eggs using computer vision and machine learning, which combined can be used to develop a robotic egg-retrieval system. The technology also can monitor laying hens’ behavior to try to determine why hens lay eggs in certain locations.

“Is it light intensity or light quality?” Chai said. “Environmental factors can affect mislaid floor eggs. If we can identify the reasons, we can suggest farmers to improve the management. For example, the birds like to lay eggs beneath the aviary system because that place has a low light intensity; we can increase the light intensity beneath the aviary system. Some Iowa farmers reduced floor eggs by 50% to 60% using this method.”

Quality of the litter is another contributing factor.

“If the litter is too deep and soft, especially close to the corner of the house, we may suggest farmers manually adjust litter depths as that could be a natural spot for the bird to nest,” Chai said.

If farmers can keep eggs from collecting on the floor, it could help avoid ingraining laying habits among the hens.

“Because mislaying is a learned behavior,” Chai said. “If they see eggs on some spots, they may think that’s maybe a nest spot.”

Conversely, Chai’s students have found that some hens refuse to lay eggs on the floor, waiting patiently for available space in nesting boxes.

“We can track those birds and use that for future breeding birds,” Chai said. “Offspring from these birds may not lay eggs on the floor.”

Chai’s work also helps determine the optimal size and design of cage-free systems.

“Theoretically a larger space is better, but we don’t want producers to invest too much on that,” Chai said. “So that is our research project currently. We still don’t know which space is best in terms of production efficiency, mislaying reduction, and cost.”

“The number one concern is avian influenza outbreak,” said Chai, noting the largest outbreak in U.S. history in 2022 that caused egg prices to more than double.

Chai’s research investigates ways to mitigate the dust generation. Use of electrostatic particle ionization (EPI), for example, improves air quality by charging particles in the air. The EPI system emits negative ionsfrom a pipe suspended in the aviary. The negative ions naturally attract and surround particles in the air, in turn making them more likely to be attracted to grounded or positively charged surfaces. This magnet-like effect causes the particles to stick together and adhere to any surface they encounter

“The particulate matter concentrations are very high; that is hurting the health of animals and the farm workers,” Chai said, citing research from his previous lab at Iowa State that monitored dust concentration nine times higher in cage-free systems versus conventional cages. “There’s a big challenge.”

Chai said that by adjusting the litter bedding material and using an electrostatic charging system, they can reduce dust by 70% compared to the conventional cage system.

Said Dunkley: “We’ve been successful looking at some of the emissions that occur from the houses themselves and ways they can reduce emissions, like greenhouse gases in the poultry production houses.”

‘Birds lay eggs everywhere’

In conventional caging, birds’ eggs automatically go to an egg collection and transportation system. In cage-free systems, however, hens often opt to lay their eggs directly on the floor instead of in nesting areas. Some farmers report up to 10% of eggs can be laid on the floor, which—in a colony producing a million eggs in a day—means 100,000 of them must be collected manually.

It’s not a tenable situation.

Chai aims to reduce the number of floor eggs, as well as the amount of time eggs spend on the floor, which can affect their value.

“Birds lay eggs everywhere,” said Chai, noting this increases costs to producers because it leads to higher rates of contamination with harmful bacteria. In addition, floor eggs are not considered table eggs for direct sale and have a higher chance of getting broken and eaten by the hens.

“If the egg is not tracked and the issue not addressed in a timely manner, an egg could be buried by the birds in thick litter,” Chai said. “If the farm staff cannot find an egg in a couple of days, you never know if it is found like three weeks later and maybe is not healthy to eat. The farmer cannot tell if that is fresh from today or from a month ago.”

Additional studies by Chai’s lab investigates ways to detect floor eggs using computer vision and machine learning, which combined can be used to develop a robotic egg-retrieval system. The technology also can monitor laying hens’ behavior to try to determine why hens lay eggs in certain locations.

“Is it light intensity or light quality?” Chai said. “Environmental factors can affect mislaid floor eggs. If we can identify the reasons, we can suggest farmers to improve the management. For example, the birds like to lay eggs beneath the aviary system because that place has a low light intensity; we can increase the light intensity beneath the aviary system. Some Iowa farmers reduced floor eggs by 50% to 60% using this method.”

Quality of the litter is another contributing factor.

“If the litter is too deep and soft, especially close to the corner of the house, we may suggest farmers manually adjust litter depths as that could be a natural spot for the bird to nest,” Chai said.

If farmers can keep eggs from collecting on the floor, it could help avoid ingraining laying habits among the hens.

“Because mislaying is a learned behavior,” Chai said. “If they see eggs on some spots, they may think that’s maybe a nest spot.”

Conversely, Chai’s students have found that some hens refuse to lay eggs on the floor, waiting patiently for available space in nesting boxes.

“We can track those birds and use that for future breeding birds,” Chai said. “Offspring from these birds may not lay eggs on the floor.”

Chai’s work also helps determine the optimal size and design of cage-free systems.

“Theoretically a larger space is better, but we don’t want producers to invest too much on that,” Chai said. “So that is our research project currently. We still don’t know which space is best in terms of production efficiency, mislaying reduction, and cost.”

Pecking order

Understanding bird behavior is another element to building better systems. Large flocks in cage-free aviaries have behavioral issues that aren’t as pronounced in caged systems.

“You’ve heard of ‘pecking order,’ right? It comes from birds,” Dunkley said. “There is a pecking order there, and the more aggressive birds are going to be the ones on the floor.”

In conventional cages, a less aggressive bird can hide in a corner so other birds sharing the cage can’t reach the hen’s back.

“But in the cage-free system,” Chai said, “when one bird is pecked by other birds, the other birds will attack the bird very quickly.”

Chai’s lab uses machine vision to monitor and track these unhealthy or problematic behaviors.

“Pecking is natural. Birds have a nature to peck on the root, on the tree, to find food. That’s a natural behavior we don’t want to stop 100%,” Chai said. “But we don’t want the bird to peck other birds. If we can detect the pecking of a bird quickly, we can provide treatment and reduce the farm’s cost.”

Researchers also experiment with adding enrichments to the aviary such as pecking stones that give birds an outlet to exhibit the behavior without being aggressive to their roommates.

“We want to figure out how many enrichments or which kind of material is best,” Chai said. “Should you provide a natural stone or use a woodblock? Or we can use a block made from grain, like barley or soybean, so after pecking the birds get some incentives. They can eat the grain material like corn as well.”

It’s an ongoing challenge to enhance productivity as the world’s consumption of poultry products keeps increasing and the poultry industry must keep up with rising demand.

“There are still a lot of other behavior we still don’t understand,” Chai said. “We don’t know the answers yet.”

Source: University of Georgia

USDA reveals plan to test poultry for Salmonella, Campylobacter; some cutbacks included

The USDA is planning to reduce some Salmonella testing for poultry products for the coming fiscal year, but that is not necessarily a bad thing.

In a 33-page sampling plan for fiscal year 2024, the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) outlines the number of samples it plans to test. The agency says most of the cutbacks are because it already has enough data to study.

“It is important to note that this document reflects the agency’s plan, and there may be a difference between the number of samples anticipated to be analyzed and the total number of samples analyzed within the fiscal year. Several variables can impact the plan as the fiscal year progresses,” according to the plan document.

“FSIS laboratories perform whole genome sequencing (WGS) on all foodborne pathogens isolated and confirmed from FSIS-regulated products. When product samples test positive for bacterial pathogens, FSIS engages with federal partners to use WGS data for regulatory and public health purposes. The information gathered from WGS helps FSIS to detect and investigate outbreaks of foodborne illness, identify potential instances of harborage, and identify unique genes, including antimicrobial resistance genes.”

The FSIS qualifies its approach to Salmonella testing, saying that some Salmonella microorganisms are less likely to result in foodborne illnesses. Some consumer protection groups have previously challenged the agency’s position, wanting testing for more types of Salmonella than the agency is proposing, but Consumer Reports says the new sampling plan makes sense in many ways.

Michael Hansen is with Consumer Reports and serves on the National Advisory Council on Microbiological Criteria for Foods. The council provides impartial scientific advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services on public health issues related to the safety of the U.S. food supply.

Hansen says it is important to note that the FSIS can now better test for Salmonella and Campylobacter.

“As science has advanced and the price of whole genome sequencing has come down, they are testing for more types of Salmonella,” Hansen said.

That is good news because a single chicken sample can be contaminated with numerous types of Salmonella, some of which are more likely to cause serious human illnesses.

Hansen also said it is good news that the agency is making results public to be further analyzed. He said another positive point in the sampling plan is that the agency is taking a closer look at Campylobacter contamination.

“Current and future efforts include exploring the use of genomic data to attribute Salmonella and Campylobacter illnesses to foods, to understand pathogen adaptability, persistence, and pathogenicity, and to use subtyping data to understand the diversity and ubiquity of pathogen subtypes found in regulated products. These efforts will also build on the public health, regulatory, and research partners’ endeavors in support of FSIS Research Priorities,” according to the sampling plan.

“. . . In FY 2023, FSIS worked with a contractor to develop an allele code scheme for naming both Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. The allele codes provide terminology that is amenable to reporting and allows for comparing FSIS isolate sequences to each other, identifying repetitive or persistent subtypes. The Campylobacter allele codes are publicly available in the establishment-specific sampling datasets,” according to the sampling plan.

The sampling plan eliminates testing in some instances, but the agency says that is because it has enough data from previous years to address illnesses from certain types of contamination.

“FSIS will continue to explore Salmonella enumeration analysis of multiple poultry product types in support of the agency’s comprehensive approach to reduce Salmonella illnesses associated with poultry products. As the presence of Salmonella and the quantity of Salmonella microorganisms can impact the likelihood of illness, FSIS will continue to examine how quantification can be incorporated into this approach. Moreover, with emerging science suggesting that not all Salmonella are equally likely to cause human illness, FSIS will explore Salmonella serotypes and virulence factors that pose the greatest public health risk,” according to the sampling plan.

One part of the sampling plan that Hansen finds troublesome is the cutback in testing of ground chicken and turkey. The FSIS plans to cut that testing by half, which Hansen says is unfortunate because such chicken products are the most likely to be contaminated.

The agency plans to

  • Suspend exploratory sampling of mechanically separated turkey and chicken products (-300 samples; implement Oct. 1, 2023); FSIS has collected adequate data from these products for analysis.
  • Suspend exploratory sampling of chicken halves and quarters (-120 samples; implement Oct. 1, 2023); FSIS has collected adequate data from these products for analysis.
  • Decrease Campylobacter analysis in all poultry products to the minimum samples needed to estimate prevalence (—13,600 tests; implement Oct. 1, 2023) while FSIS considers the next steps for Campylobacter policy.
  • Decrease sample scheduling for comminuted chicken and turkey products by 50% to align with the routine sampling assignments for carcasses and parts(-2,000 samples; implement Jan. 1, 2024).

More key points from the fiscal year 2024 sampling plan
The FSIS has already begun an effort to reduce Salmonella in certain raw, breaded chicken products. The 2024 plan addresses some of that effort. The agency plans to implement verification testing approaches for raw, not ready-to-eat (NRTE) breaded, stuffed chicken products.

Other points in the sampling plan for poultry for the 2024 fiscal year include:

  • Reducing the number of tests for Salmonella and Campylobacter for ground and other comminuted chicken (not mechanically separated) from 2,500 to 1,250;
  • Reducing the testing of turkey carcasses from 1,730 to 700;
  • Reducing ground and other comminuted turkey (not Mechanically Separated) from 1,500 to 750 and
  • Eliminating the exploratory for mechanically separated turkey.

Source: Food Safety News

Vaccination and Surveillance for HPAI in Poultry

The upcoming event, “Vaccination and Surveillance for HPAI in Poultry: Current Situation and Perspectives,” organized by the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), is set to take place in Paris, France, on October 22-23, 2024. This hybrid meeting will gather experts from around the globe to discuss the pressing issues surrounding High Pathogenicity Avian Influenza (HPAI) in poultry.

Background and importance

HPAI, particularly the H5Nx 2.3.4.4b lineage, poses a significant threat to poultry, wild birds, and even mammals worldwide. The virus’s ability to spread rapidly and cause severe economic and ecological damage necessitates a comprehensive approach to control and prevention. The WOAH meeting aims to address these challenges by focusing on vaccination and surveillance strategies.

Objectives of the meeting

The primary goal of this meeting is to review the current situation of HPAI and explore future perspectives on vaccination and surveillance. The event will bring together a diverse group of stakeholders, including representatives from the World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the World Trade Organization (WTO), governments, poultry breeding and biological companies, animal welfare organizations, and scientists.

Key topics and discussions

  1. Current epidemiological situation:
    • The spread of HPAI varies across continents, but the virus remains entrenched in wild birds and parts of the poultry population. This session will provide an overview of the current epidemiological landscape and the challenges faced by different regions.
  2. Vaccination strategies:
  3. Surveillance in vaccinated populations:
    • One of the significant challenges of vaccination is maintaining effective surveillance. This session will explore methods to monitor vaccinated populations, detect outbreaks early, and ensure that vaccination does not hinder disease detection.
  4. Trade and economic implications:
    • The impact of HPAI on international trade is profound. Experts will discuss how vaccination and surveillance can be harmonized with trade regulations to minimize economic disruptions while ensuring biosecurity.
  5. Animal welfare and public health:
    • The welfare of poultry and the potential risks to human health are critical considerations. This session will address how vaccination can improve animal welfare, reduce the risk of zoonotic transmission, and enhance public health outcomes.

Expected outcomes

The meeting aims to produce a set of recommendations that will guide future policies and practices in HPAI control. These recommendations will be based on the latest scientific data and the collective expertise of the participants. The event will also foster collaboration among international organizations, governments, and the private sector, promoting a unified approach to tackling HPAI.

HPAI

Conclusion

The “Vaccination and Surveillance for HPAI in Poultry: Current Situation and Perspectives” meeting represents a critical step towards addressing the global challenge of HPAI. By bringing together a wide range of experts and stakeholders, the event aims to develop innovative solutions that will enhance the effectiveness of vaccination and surveillance programs. This collaborative effort is essential for safeguarding poultry health, ensuring food security, and protecting public health on a global scale.

Developing a Meat and Poultry Processing Workforce Training Center in Puerto Rico: A Strategic Response to Food Security and Economic Growth

With the island producing less than 15% of the food it consumes, food security is at high risk. This situation is particularly dire for families in rural areas, who have been disproportionately affected by these challenges.

In response to these pressing issues, the Inter American University of Puerto Rico (Barranquitas and Guayama Campuses) are spearheading a groundbreaking initiative–the establishment of a Meat and Poultry Processing Workforce Training Center. Funded by a $950,000 Hispanic-Serving Institutions Education Grant in 2023 from USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture, this four-year project aims to revitalize Puerto Rico’s agriculture sector by developing a skilled workforce in meat and poultry production and processing.

Project Director Dr. Yesenia Rivera-Rivera said the project offers more than training.

“This project, beyond training, is a business option for those interested in entering the meat industry in Puerto Rico with the skills and knowledge that make them competitive,” Rivera-Rivera said.  “And at the same time, it guarantees Puerto Ricans fresh food from farm to table, minimizing the risk of food shortages.”

Students interested in entering the meat industry in Puerto Rico.
Students interested in entering the meat industry in Puerto Rico.

The project recognizes the vital role agriculture can play in ensuring food security, generating employment and driving economic growth. By focusing on meat and poultry production, the initiative seeks to strengthen the supply chain for these essential animal-based proteins, which are the main source of protein for Puerto Rico’s population. Currently, only 8.86% of beef, 3.4% of pork, and 21% of chicken consumed on the island are produced locally. The new training center aims to boost these numbers, reducing dependence on imports and enhancing food security.

A Unique Workforce Development Opportunity 

The Meat and Poultry Processing Workforce Training Center will be the first of its kind in Puerto Rico. It will recruit 110 students, offering them specialized academic programs designed to meet industry standards. Each campus will be equipped with state-of-the-art laboratories, providing students with hands-on experience in meat and poultry processing at the industrial level. This practical training will be complemented by online education, ensuring that the programs are accessible to a wide range of students.

Student feeding sheep.
Student feeding sheep. 

The initiative also includes partnerships with industry experts and the Small Business Technology Development Center to ensure that the curriculum is relevant and up-to-date. A symposium on meat and poultry processing will be held as part of the project, bringing together academia, industry and farmers to share knowledge and best practices.

The development of the Meat and Poultry Processing Workforce Training Center in Puerto Rico is a strategic response to the island’s food security and economic challenges. By investing in the education and training of a new generation of meat and poultry professionals, this initiative will not only strengthen Puerto Rico’s agricultural sector but also provide a pathway to economic growth and sustainability. This project is a testament to the power of education and industry collaboration in addressing the most pressing issues facing our society today.

Source: USDA NIFA

Raising pigs and poultry the topic of Penn State Extension webinar

For those interested in raising swine or poultry, Penn State Extension is offering a webinar titled “Living on a Few Acres: Backyard Swine and Poultry” from 6 to 8 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 10.

This session is designed for the new or beginning producer embarking on swine or poultry production and homesteaders seeking self-sufficiency. Organizers noted that participants can learn the fundamentals of raising healthy birds and pigs with expert guidance tailored to their goals.

Elizabeth Hines, extension swine specialist and assistant professor of animal science in Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences, will address key considerations for raising pigs for pork, from setting clear goals to ensuring animal comfort and the profitability of the operation.

Torey Fischer, poultry extension educator, will cover the essentials of poultry farming, including breed selection, feeding programs, egg production and meat processing.

PSE noted, “Participants must register by 11:45 p.m. Oct. 9 to receive the link to access the live webinar. A $5 registration fee accompanies the event. Registrants also will receive access to the webinar recording.”

More information is available on the Penn State Extension website at https://extension.psu.edu/living-on-a-few-acres-backyard-swine-and-poultry.

Source: Latrobe Bulletin

Is it bad to eat eggs every day?

Eggs are a staple in many diets around the world, known for their high protein content and versatility in cooking. However, the question of whether it is safe to consume eggs daily has been a topic of debate. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there are several factors to consider when incorporating eggs into your daily diet.

Nutritional benefits

Eggs are packed with essential nutrients. They are an excellent source of high-quality protein, which is crucial for muscle repair and growth. Additionally, eggs contain important vitamins and minerals such as vitamin B12, vitamin D, and selenium. The yolk is particularly rich in choline, which is vital for brain health.

Cholesterol concerns

One of the primary concerns about eating eggs every day is their cholesterol content. A single large egg contains about 186 milligrams of cholesterol, all of which is found in the yolk. For many years, dietary cholesterol was believed to significantly impact blood cholesterol levels and increase the risk of heart disease. However, recent studies have shown that for most people, dietary cholesterol has a minimal effect on blood cholesterol levels.

The WHO suggests that healthy individuals can safely consume up to one egg per day without increasing their risk of cardiovascular disease. However, individuals with diabetes or existing heart conditions should be more cautious and consult with their healthcare provider.

Moderation and balance

The key to a healthy diet is moderation and balance. While eggs can be part of a nutritious diet, they should not be the sole source of protein. The WHO recommends a varied diet that includes a wide range of protein sources such as fish, legumes, nuts, and lean meats. This ensures that you receive a broad spectrum of nutrients necessary for overall health.

Storage and preparation

Proper storage and preparation are also crucial to avoid foodborne illnesses. Eggs should be stored in the refrigerator and consumed before their expiration date. When cooking eggs, ensure they are fully cooked to eliminate the risk of salmonella infection.

Conclusion

In conclusion, eating eggs every day can be part of a healthy diet for most people, provided it is done in moderation and as part of a balanced diet. The WHO emphasizes the importance of considering individual health conditions and consulting with healthcare providers for personalized dietary advice. By following these guidelines, you can enjoy the nutritional benefits of eggs while minimizing potential health risks.

Source: avinews.com

U.S.: Broiler exports remain steady at historically low levels

The United States has long been a significant player in the global poultry market, particularly in broiler exports. However, recent trends indicate that U.S. broiler exports have remained steady at historically low levels. This situation is influenced by a combination of market dynamics, international competition, and shifting demand patterns.

Historical context and current trends

Historically, the U.S. has been a major exporter of broiler meat, benefiting from its efficient production systems and high-quality standards. However, in recent years, the landscape has changed. According to the USDA, U.S. broiler exports totaled 608.7 million pounds in January 2024, a decrease of 3.4% from January 2023. This decline is part of a broader trend where U.S. broiler exports have struggled to maintain their previous highs.

Factors contributing to low export levels

Several factors contribute to the current state of U.S. broiler exports. One significant factor is the increased competition from other major poultry-exporting countries, particularly Brazil. Brazil has been able to offer competitive prices, making it a preferred supplier in many international markets. Additionally, rising production costs in the U.S. have made American broiler meat less competitive on the global stage.

Another contributing factor is the changing demand patterns in key export markets. For instance, China, which was once a major importer of U.S. broiler meat, has significantly reduced its imports. In January 2024, China accounted for only 1.4% of U.S. broiler exports. This decline is partly due to China’s efforts to boost its domestic poultry production and reduce reliance on imports.

Impact on the U.S. poultry industry

The steady yet low levels of broiler exports have several implications for the U.S. poultry industry. On one hand, it has prompted producers to focus more on the domestic market, where demand remains robust. The USDA projects that domestic consumption of broiler meat will continue to grow, driven by its affordability compared to other meats like beef and pork.

On the other hand, the industry faces challenges in maintaining profitability amid rising production costs and stagnant export growth. Producers are exploring ways to enhance efficiency and reduce costs to remain competitive. Innovations in feed technology, breeding practices, and processing methods are some of the strategies being employed to achieve this goal.

Future outlook

Looking ahead, the future of U.S. broiler exports will depend on several factors, including global economic conditions, trade policies, and advancements in production technology. While the USDA projects a steady growth in broiler exports through 2033, reaching 8.07 billion pounds, the industry must navigate the complexities of international trade and competition.

In conclusion, while U.S. broiler exports remain steady at historically low levels, the industry is adapting to the changing landscape. By focusing on efficiency and innovation, U.S. poultry producers aim to maintain their position in the global market and capitalize on emerging opportunities

Source: avinews.com

Pure Prairie Poultry Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, Owes Millions to Creditors

Pure Prairie Poultry Inc., the owner of a chicken processing plant in Charles City, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Minnesota, citing significant financial difficulties. According to the company’s court filing, it owes hundreds of creditors between $100 million and $500 million, with assets amounting to only between $50 million and $100 million.

Among the creditors is the City of Charles City, which is owed $507,151.56. Other debtors include entities in several states, such as Illinois, Indiana, Georgia, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Arkansas, and Florida.

Pure Prairie Poultry purchased the processing plant from Simply Essentials in 2021, with plans to create around 400 jobs by 2024. The plant had been shut down since 2019 prior to the acquisition. However, financial troubles have now forced the company to seek bankruptcy protection, leaving the future of the plant and its promised jobs uncertain.

Study finds poultry as a major source of drug-resistant Campylobacter infections in the U.S.

A new study has identified poultry as the primary source of human Campylobacter infections in the United States, and there are significant concerns about increasing antibiotic resistance.

Researchers from the Ineos Oxford Institute for Antimicrobial Research, using machine learning techniques and data from U.S. national surveillance, have found that 68 percent of Campylobacter cases between 2009 and 2019 originated from contaminated poultry. The findings were published in the Journal of Infection.

Campylobacter causes infections in the intestines of birds and mammals, often transmitted through undercooked meat or contaminated food. The study highlights growing concerns about the rise of antibiotic resistance in bacteria found in the food chain, particularly in poultry, the most consumed meat in the U.S.

Leveraging machine learning for source attribution
The research used genomic data from 8,856 human Campylobacter infection samples and compared them to 16,703 genomes from potential animal sources, including poultry, cattle, wild birds and pork. The study employed advanced machine learning techniques to identify genetic markers in the bacteria, allowing researchers to trace the likely origins of the infections.

The study found that poultry was the leading source of Campylobacter infections, accounting for 68 percent of cases. Cattle were the second-largest contributor at 28 percent, while wild birds and pork played a much smaller role, contributing 3 percent and 1 percent of infections, respectively.

Ben Pascoe, a research fellow at the Ineos Oxford Institute (IOI), emphasized the significance of the data-sharing collaboration.

“The study uses data collected by multiple U.S. public health agencies. By sharing data and expertise, we’ve been able to conduct the largest study of this kind and provide invaluable data on the source of human infections,” Pascoe said.

Antimicrobial resistance on the rise
One of the key concerns highlighted by the study is the growing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Campylobacter, especially among poultry strains. Over the study period, researchers observed a noticeable increase in AMR genes, particularly among bacteria originating from chicken sources. This poses a significant threat to public health, as infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria are more difficult to treat and can lead to more severe health outcomes.

Professor Samuel Sheppard, who led the research at IOI, warned of the urgent need to address this issue within the poultry industry.

“We’ve shown that not only is poultry a significant reservoir of Campylobacter infections, but that AMR is increasing in livestock, especially poultry. To protect ourselves and our antibiotics, the poultry industry must look to reduce the spread of infection among poultry as a matter of urgency,” Sheppard said.

Implications for food safety and public health
The study’s findings significantly affect public health and food safety policy. With poultry being a major contributor to Campylobacter infections in humans, the research suggests that targeted interventions in the poultry industry could be one of the most effective ways to reduce the incidence of campylobacteriosis and curb the spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Campylobacter infections are among the most common bacterial foodborne illnesses in the U.S., causing symptoms such as diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps. In some cases, especially among individuals with weakened immune systems, the infection can lead to severe complications and hospitalization. The rise of antibiotic resistance further exacerbates these risks.

As policymakers and industry leaders work to improve food safety standards, the study underscores the need for enhanced surveillance, better hygiene practices in food production, and reducing antibiotic use in agriculture to help protect public health.

The complete study can be found here.

Source: Food Safety News

Poultry News

Translate Web in Your Language »